To Dad With Love

A Tribute to a Beloved Father

Tag: Writing

Film review: The Killing of a Sacred Deer


In an affecting opening scene of Yorgos Lanthimos’ mythical new film The Killing of a Sacred Deer a heart is pumping. The actual human organ. In full public view. It is pumping. And pumping. For however many minutes too long. And the movie seems to hold its breath until a pair of blood-stained gloves is dropped into the bin.

With clean hands, Steven Murphy (Colin Farrell), the cardiothoracic surgeon, walks down the hospital corridor with a colleague, talking about expensive watches. At the day’s close he goes home to an affluent neighbourhood in a mid-Western American town where he lives with his wife Anna (Nicole Kidman), an opthalmologist, and their teenage daughter, Kim (Raffey Cassidy) and younger son, Bob (Sunny Suljic).

Life seems successful, blissful, perfect. So, for a while, one wonders about the relationship between this sure-footed doctor and a boy, Martin (Barry Keoghan), whom he keeps clandestine contact.

Suspicions of any secret sexual arrangements are quickly dispelled when Steven invites the 16-year-old to lunch with his family whom the young man goes on to charm. Then, as Martin insinuates himself more and more into the Murphy household, exploiting especially Kim’s innocent infatuation, a mysterious illness descends without warning on the children.

From Lanthimos’ choice of title, we will no doubt be drawn to the Greek legend in which following Argamemnon’s slaying of a deer that belonged to Artemis, the price the goddess demanded to release her hold on the wind — needed for the King’s ships to sail out to war — was the life of his own daughter, Iphigenia.

The director and co-writer, in transposing this ancient tale to a modern-day scenario, clearly wants us to see the way responsibility and justice can be brought on perpetrators of crime by worldly (or other-worldly) forces.

Soon, we learn about a medical misadventure years ago in which Martin’s father died while undergoing open-heart surgery carried out by Steven, who has had on that occasion too much to drink. And the deed he must now perform to break the curse upon Bob and Kim, delivered by the deceased patient’s surviving son, is as absurd as it is inconceivable.

Using astonishingly quotidian conversations (about body hair and lemonade and periods), and a deft air of eeriness, with Martin seemingly lurking at the edge of your consciousness, Lanthimos presents a horror story steeped in dark humour and retribution, quid pro quo and grisliness.

While a psychological thriller built on a well-known Greek tragedy is a novel concept, you cannot help but struggle to reconcile with the idea that Martin, the creepy, stony-faced, awkward youngster, bent on destruction is by parallel the goddess of wilderness, childbirth, virginity, Artemis.

Often pushed far inside the screen by Thimios Bakatakis’ wide-angled lens, The Killing of a Sacred Deer, unlike the Hellenic lore that allows for different possible endings, is about terminal sentence by birth, when hands are soaked indelibly in blood.


Theatre review: Yerma


An elemental feel pervades this radical revival of Federico Garcia Lorca’s 1934 tragedy. Simon Stone’s version uproots it from 20th-century rural Spain and transplants it in current-day London. His production is blunt, rather than poetic, focusing on the eponymous character, emphasising the physical. Yerma is barren-ness in Spanish. Despite conversations that suggest how the house she shares with her partner, John, is furnished, the set, enclosed within a glass-box — intimating, perhaps, the woman’s closeted, myopic view of her situation — is always nearly empty. It is a world in which lives and emotions are played out in full view to total strangers in our internet-age; here, Yerma’s anguish over her inability to fall pregnant is spilled across cyber-space through online confessions.

Played by Billie Piper, the protagonist is a senior lifestyle journalist who, trekking well into her 30s, is gripped by angst over the inexorable ticking of her biological clock. In contrast with Juan, the husband in the original script, who is a farmer, John is a frequent-travelling top-level executive. There is a fleeting allusion the trips may well be to disguise a paucity of desire for Yerma. But it remains, until the end, hard to discern whether John is selfish or sensitive. Either way, it becomes apparent, as time passes and no child appears, with Yerma moving increasingly towards breaking-point it is the absence of fecundity not fondling that despairs her.

This absence is made more potent when in one scene as Yerma and John are fussing soundlessly about a baby, the stage is decked out with actual couches and real tables. The infant belongs to Mary, Yerma’s sister, as it turns out. Things quickly return to the vacant normal after they leave. But the completeness has made the void more stark, and pronounced. The pain of childlessness is vividly conveyed.

We understand, hence, Yerma’s growing panic and debilitating feelings of helplessness. Yet, in an extravagant departure from Lorca’s work, no part of her deteriorating mental state can be attributable to any social pressure that was present in the conservative and deeply religious agricultural community. As a matter of fact, in this incarnation, both her sister and mother are entirely unmotherly, and even Yerma had herself defied gender definitions. Still, to be fair, one must concede there is probably little distinction by way of the weight upon her mind.

The brilliant, flawless acting by Piper is supported by Brendan Cowell in his fine portrayal of John. There is also good work from John McMillan as Yerma’s ensorcelling ex-lover, and Thalissa Teixeira, her junior colleague.

Brought from the theatre at Young Vic, London, to a cinema in Melbourne, Victoria, Yerma is a vigorous staging, compellingly performed, even if the power of the play may have been somewhat curtailed, despite its modern-time resonance, and psychological insight.



Film review: Final Portrait


The appeal of Final Portrait grows and grows. It is an episode in the life of Alberto Giacometti who is renown for his sculptures and paintings. Written and directed by Stanley Tucci, the film is based on a true account documented in a book by James Lord, an American writer and art critic, about an event of which he was involved.

It is Paris 1964. James (Armie Hammer) has changed his reservation to depart for New York following an invitation from Alberto (Geoffrey Rush) to sit as his subject for a portrait. After all, it is merely over an afternoon, the young man has been made to understand. But, when 63-year-old Alberto suggests later, in passing, that a work can indeed never been finished, it appears obvious the New Yorker is set to stay on for a few more afternoons, and a few afternoons more.

In the — what turns out to be — 18 days he winds up having to delay his flight at huge personal expense, never mind to contend with an agitated lover pining for his return, however, James (and the audience) come to experience the revered painter in intimate and extraordinary fashion.

Self-critical and fully given over to his art, Rush’s stooped and grizzled Alberto seems to enjoy being depressed. “He is happy only when he is desperate and uncomfortable, ” says Diego (Tony Shalhoub), his calm and unassuming brother.

James, exasperated at the eccentricity that drives the artist to repeatedly wipe out what has already been accomplished, exclaims, “He seems determined to be completely dissatisfied.”

Perfectly dissatisfied,” Diego corrects him.

So, to the anguish of his long-suffering wife, Annette (Sylvie Testud) — herself guilty of (or perhaps driven to) infidelity — Alberto obsesses with a prostitute called Caroline (Clemence Poesy). Altogether unpredictable and careless with money his profligacy toward the young  woman is matched only by his meanness toward his spouse.

And all this time, as he sits again and again for his picture to be done, nearly at the end of his tether, swimming between sessions to relieve the physical and psychological strain, James remains impeccably polite, patient, self-restrained, in Hammer’s fine performance.

A clever and unexpected close arrives finally to end the vibrating tension. Tucci, known both for his acting and directing skills, has proven to be himself no less an artist, oiling the portrait of Giacometti with fascinating texture and exquisite nuance.

Theatre review: Loves Me /Loves Me Not


JC Clapham tells us quite a lot of stories in his new story-telling comedy, many of them funny, some of them poignant, all of them heartfelt. Loves Me/Loves Me Not is a self-deprecating, charming, bone-deep portrayal of falling in love, losing it, finding oneself, plus all the heartaches and joys snuggled up in between. It is a portrait of disappointments and loneliness, shrouded under the impenetrable cloud of depression, wonderfully performed by the 35-year-old on the back of his successful debut with Humpty Dumpty Daddy.

Joel first encountered his (now) ex-wife 12 years ago through a working colleague who encouraged her visiting niece to contact him. On meeting her, the young man found himself at once enamoured by the guest’s various idiosyncrasies.

So, after a fairy-tale romance the love-birds tied the knot and went on to have three (premeditated) children. It was around the arrival of their third child, however, when things started unravelling, as familiar dark clouds began again to descend upon him. Arguments ensued, views diverged, and 18 months later with mutual agreement, the couple decided to part.

As anybody who has experienced break-ups will no doubt understand, the twilit liminal region between pair-bondedness and single-hood is probably one of the hardest to navigate. In his city bachelor’s pad Joel has turned to his pet-turtle for company. And, to find love again the handsome millennial has also returned to the dating scene, that invariably brings along new feelings of frustration and loss.

In this meditation on identity and reflection, delivered with delicate wit and humour, we relate with the intricate fabric of one talented man’s story, and witness his exceptional capacity for confidence and candour.


Film review: Mother!


From the very first shots Darren Aronofsky’s Mother! unsettles, as an amorphous membrane heaves and pulsates, like some breathing organism. And, at the same time the walls of a house seem to be transmogrified, there are surreal impressions of fire and destruction. It will be a long time — a long time after we have left the cinema, perhaps — before we realise what they are, or at least represent. In the interim, more than enough horrors emerge with perverse ubiquity to keep us (reluctantly) occupied.

Bluntly hacked into two parts — one, about barren-ness, the other fecundity — and shot in crowded, intense colours, the film details the unravelling of a young woman (Jennifer Lawrence), and the life and home she has built around her poet husband (Javier Bardem).

The couple lives in a large isolated dwelling of countless rooms with cellars and hidden dungeons. We learn it had burnt down years ago, and Jennifer (for want of a character name) is trying to restore it to its early glory. Meanwhile, middle-aged Javier is suffering from writer’s block, and has been ignoring the needs of his youthful wife. And when a mysterious stranger (Ed Harris) arrives at the door, bringing along his sultry spouse (Michelle Pfeiffer), and their catalogue of troubles, Javier singularly welcomes them.

Unfolding with growing absurdity Mother! is the first movie at which I was on the very verge of walking out. Terror continues to mount when Jennifer falls pregnant and inspiration juices return for the self-centred Javier who, while basking in the runaway success of his latest publication, opens their house to a deluge of crushing, invading, looting fans.

With the use of hyperboles and tropes, Aronofsky shocks and disturbs us into recognising how some artists might do whatever it takes for the sake of celebrityhood or of their work. “Nothing is ever enough,” Javier says to a dying Jennifer. ” I would not be able to create if it was.” More than that, the writer-director through the relentless unspooling of gratuitous violence grills our minds into witnessing the damage wrought by humankind on mother Earth as they give in to endless excesses in pursuit of self-interests.

Amid all the untold chaos blood oozes out slowly and inexplicably from beneath a floor board, like our planet on a quiet haemorrhage. Yet, Javier will never notice this; his cares are invested in salvaging the (literal) stone of inspiration from among the ashes, and replaying the whole squalid chapter again (and maybe again).


Book review: The Childhood of Jesus

the childhood of jesus

JM Coetzee’s The Childhood of Jesus is a cryptic tale set in Novilla, a city populated by people who have accepted the chance to live. Upon arrival residents are given new names and washed of their memories. Life is sustained on an appetite of asceticism; and hunger, like desires and impulse, is regarded as “a dog in the belly” that must be starved. There is plenty of goodwill, and social welfare thinly lines everybody’s pockets.

Middle-aged man, Simon, fresh from the processing camp has tasked himself with tracking down the mother of David, a child he had met on the boat to this present life. The boy has no recollection of her and the letter in a pouch strung round his neck is lost. Ines — the woman whom Simon, guided by intuition, decides is David’s parent — dotes on her son with profligacy. But, the six-year-old turns out to be a handful at school, supposedly from ambiguity about his heritage. As the family flees from education authorities, David, while on the road, urges others to follow him.

Philosophical questions are a provocative motif in this complex and confounding novel that, written in taut, elegant prose, infuses an enigmatic country with symbolism and soul.

Theatre review: The One


A man (Mark Storen) and a woman (Georgia King) encounter each other following “a summer of break-ups” when after a long time they find themselves single again. They make conversation, make love, fall in love. Soon, it has been two years since the nameless couple lived together, and things seem to be going well. Then, news arrives of his younger brother’s upcoming wedding that, when combined with the pressure of turning 40, prompts the man to want to advance his life through tying the knot.

Jeffrey Jay Fowler’s sobering account, a multi-award winning work first seen in Western Australia that now comes to Melbourne as part of the Fringe Festival, is an unflinching examination of the impermanence of intimacy in a relationship, and the confusing role of marriage in reversing this inevitability.

The man believes only by being husband and wife he can be relieved of the constant anxiety of losing the woman; when challenged, he lashes out that formalising status alone will compel people who have fallen out of love to fall back into love.

Interspersing third-person narratives with first-person embodiments, as the characters seamlessly segue in and out of scenes, Fowler uses rap and action and songs to tell the (ubiquitous) story, presenting perspectives and counter-perspectives on this universal tradition whose relevance appears to be atrophying.

Despite feeling terrible for turning down his sincere, down-on-one-knee proposal, the woman remains impervious in her conviction the legal arrangement is a mere mechanism to confer ownership of her future to the man, like chattel. Defiantly, she insists she prefers to wake in the morning, and choose to be with him, rather than allow any government to make that choice.

The play is delivered with plenty of energy and finesse in an absorbing production that reverberates with poetry and humour and utter realness. While sometimes funny this 60-minute rarest of gems is ultimately a portrait of the way we instinctively try to protect ourselves from getting hurt, by avoiding or pursuing matrimony, whatever the gender.

King gives a wonderfully intense performance: assertive, vulnerable, panic-struck by turns. She is most memorable in her portrayal of the inebriated guest at the brother’s wedding party mocking the whole celebration. And deeply we feel for Storen’s romantic, idealistic man, his consummate skills as a musician — liquid, melodious voice riding on waves of strings — connecting one with our softer, often-buried, forgotten sides.

Under Fowler’s exceptional direction The One is erotic not only through the artfully graphic script: the enactment of the man’s nightmare, for example, in which he dreams of being a strong, lusty, wild cave-man on a quest to possess the sensual, wet, sultry cave-woman is breath-y and angry and (in the scorching lighting) hot.

Faultlessly, this is the kind of theatre that will send lovers and un-lovers into complex and confronting journeys as they study their own bedroom affairs.

Film review: Kiki, Love to Love


Bursting with colours of grapefruit flesh and fig, and moving to the vigorous rhythm of copulating wildlife, Kiki, Love to Love is like a collection of sensual frames from several dramas: scenes meant to be reprieves from main plots to delve into characters’ intimate moments, or distractions of yearning moods. Only, here, these distractions are in need of distractions, intimacies are explicit, the frames salacious. In other words, this Madrilenian feature by Paco Leon with five distinct storylines is curious.

Natalia (Natalia de Molina) and Alex (Alex Garcia) are a young and beautiful couple much in love (and lust) until she reveals how an episode at the petrol-station in which she was held at knife-point by a robber had brought on an orgasm more intense than any she had ever had.

Ana (Ana Katz) and Paco (Leon, himself),both liberal-minded and arguably progressive are married for eight years, and things have begun to turn stale. So, when a flirtatious friend, Belen (Belen Cuesta) shows up flaunting kisses and breasts, juicy ideas start to flow.

Candela (Candela Pena) is a woman longing to be a mother. The doctor tells her a paucity of climaxes on her part during love-making may be the problem in her maternal quest. Then, the fortuitous realisation she seems to be aroused by her husband Antonio’s (Luis Callejo) tears means she now has a lot of planning to get into.

Meanwhile, Doctora Ginecóloga (Blanca Apilanez), a plastic surgeon ejaculates each night as he watches his wheelchair-bound wife (Mari Paz Savago) sleep. To ease his sexual tension he allows himself to drug her and succumb to the blackmail of their housekeeper.

Sandra (Alexandra Jimenez) is a half-deaf woman who finds sensory gratification in fine fabrics. As a translator for the hearing-impaired she encounters a boy for whom she acts as an intermediary with a sex-line operator.

Working with  chutzpah and creativity, Leon appears to take sexual imaginings to the point of parody. The film refrains from going on overdrive in the actual act. But the dialogues and narratives are saturated with the subject. Characters are preoccupied either with fulfilling their own fetishes or those of their lovers.

Kiki, Love to Love does not pretend to be more than fluff. The acting, however, is first-rated, and the colourful cinematography (Kiko de la Rica) excellent, although on a whole the movie reminds me why I am sometimes nostalgic for black-and-white pictures, where reprieves add to the tale, rather than bunched up into something without reprieve.

Film review: A Ghost Story


“… the reason for living [is] to get ready to stay dead a long time.” says William Faulkner, in his novel As I Lay Dying. This may perhaps be what David Lowery is driving at with his latest feature. A poem to human connection and legacy A Ghost Story powerfully evokes the notion that the sense of what one leaves behind is, not in who remembers you or for how long but, in the thing(s) they do to those you love.

A man (Casey Affleck) and a woman (Rooney Mara) live in a plain, ranch-style residence, somewhere. We do not know their names. He is a musician, although it is not clear what she does. One day, while canoodling during an intimate moment, she relates how when she was little she would hide a scribbled-note in some crevice each time before the family moved away.

The next thing we know, he is dead, slumped over a wheel, in an accident. After she has replaced the cover over his head and departed the morgue, the spirit of the deceased man rises, draped in the full-length sheet with two eye-holes. Wading, he returns dragging the white cloth about him like a wedding-dress to the house where he shall haunt from this point forward.

Held together without extraneous words or scenes in which hard-cuts are strategic as line-breaks, the movie uses time like meter and rhyme to dramatise the poetic narrative. Both long and short, time, here, moves forth and back and starts over, slipping then and stalling now. In one scene, the woman overcome by grief sits on the kitchen floor to eat a pie a friend has dropped off. She takes a mouthful. Then, another. Another. And again, whittling down the huge dish, for what seems like forever. Yet, other decades, indeed tens of decades unspool in seconds when the ghost travels into the future and the past to relive an unborn history or visit an obsolete fate.

Clothed in the same inscrutable linen for nearly the entire film Affleck astonishes with the range of emotions he manages to convey through neither expression nor speech. As the spread droops or holds we can almost discern the helplessness and anger, jealousy and affection breathing within the hollowness.

For all that has been said about Lowery’s startlingly low-tech choices in his production, sounds from Johnny Marshall’s design seem sometimes to come from outside the screen, right next to us, a creepy feeling in a story far more profound than creepy.

Inching ever closer to his lover’s outstretched hands while she lies listening to his last composition, in apparent desire for (re)connection, the ghost makes one reflect on why we do what we do when piece-by-piece we build on our work. And having to die twice to find rest from what his significant-other too has left (albeit concealed), he goes on to show us the reason for living could well be to leave behind what matters to whom that matter to you.


Theatre review: Mirror’s Edge

Mirror's Edge

“Who am I?” asks Kai (Rebecca Poynton), if internally to herself. An otherwise quintessential Aussie but for her yellow skin, the Melburnian arrives at Lake Tyrrell in the regional town of Sea Lake, angry and embittered by prejudices she has had to endure in a white country. Here, she encounters motel-operator, Leanne (Rachel Shrives), an ocker Australian trying to capitalise on the Chinese tourist-dollar, that has of late been seduced by the lake’s reflective waters and clear sky. Agreeing to a collaborative project to revive the “impossible” place draws not only Kai into an exquisite insight for herself, but (hopefully) also us for the nation as a whole. The unborn future is a much more promising world by the play’s end.

Calling back to mind one’s history, and noting our predicament at a time of unprecedented migration, to imagine a more prosperous and colourful multi-cultural melting-pot, underpins Kim Ho’s new play. This is a poetic piece that tucks today’s xenophobia beneath the desolation of a girl’s identity crisis. Its rigour and resonance go well beyond the country-specific context.

In keeping, perhaps, with the mythical powers of the body of water, the show brings together five distinct narratives across three hundred years into one smooth and fluid intersection.

A wealthy William Stanbridge (Martin Hoggart) in 1851 assures the aboriginal custodians of due respect for their culture and mores upon his acquisition of the land. His domestic help, Aoife (Eleanor Young), falls in love with Lao Ghit (Antonia Yip Siew Pin), a native Chinese panning for gold after losing her son. Xiao Yu (Jo Chen), a Malaysian overseas student in 1966 befriends Jasmin (Lucy Holz), a scholar who goes on to publish a research paper on Aboriginal Astronomy. Castor (Eden Gonford), an indigenous ranger, inspired by Jasmin’s publication vows to safeguard his ancestral territory  from “Chinese invasion”. And Kai presents as the juncture in which all the stories converge.

Bickering between the new business partners over the way Kai invariably believes her own kind is somehow better than the ordinary white person makes for rich metaphorical drama, with nuanced allusions to the ever-present stereo-typing of aborigines.

In one scene Lao Ghit relates her heart-wrenching account to Aoife wholly in Cantonese. While this seems to alienate the English-only-speaking members of audience, the move offers a taste of what it feels to be left out and marginalised.

Although Petra Kalive’s direction, like Ho’s writing, has a touch of the scalpel, the staging is tender and funny and steeped in eloquent symbols. The set sparkles as starlight projected on a shimmering backdrop is mirrored on the wet surface, characters sometimes seen behind the screen , as if they’re beyond the sky. There is no palpable change in lighting throughout the 70-minute production, making the jump in (or confluence of) time the stuff of hallucination.

A deft concept, Mirror’s Edge balances the magic of traditional beliefs with the hard, implacable reality we are confronted with. It gently persuades us that no conflict is irreconcilable through creativity and an open mind, not before, however, the quiet contemplation about who we are, but, most of all, can be.

%d bloggers like this: